A fascinating distinction between Tahara and Hasidus is described towards the end of chapter nineteen, where the Ramchal compares the intent and motivation of the Tahor to that of the Hasid:
"Earlier [in chapter 16, on Tahara] we have already spoken about the different levels of L'shmah and non-L'shmah. However, certainly one who intends in his service to purify his soul before his creator in order to merit to be included among the upright and the pious, to experience the pleasantness of Hashem, to visit his sanctuary and to receive the reward of the next world - we cannot say that such an intent is bad, but nor can we say that it is the best. For as long as a person has himself in mind, his service is ultimately self-serving. The true kavanah that is found by the Hasidim who worked and strove to achieve it, is for man to serve Hashem solely in order that the honor of the Master, may He be blessed, should grow and increase..."
A person can perform a mitzvah perfectly, with a kavana which is Tahor and L'shmah, but there is still room for improvement. A mitzvah done because I want to get close to Hashem is indeed a beautiful thing, but it is not "the best." It is still about me.
"Do not be a servant who serves his Master on the condition that he receives reward - but rather like the servant who serves hos Master unconditionally - and the awe of heaven shall be upon you " (Perkie Avoth).
ReplyDeleteThe nullification of self - "Hisbatlus" that comes from "Yeras Hashem". Raishis Chochma Yeras Hashem - the highest highest level is Yeras Hashem. At that level here